Photo Andy Murch

CITES CoP19 will be hosted in Panama November 2022

Shark Stewards will be at CoP19 with our colleagues and partners, working in support of a new proposal to list the entire family of Carcharhindae which includes blue sharks, and river sharks, supports enforcement and strengthening of existing listings.

The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna & Flora (CITES)

CITES is an international agreement between governments that regulates trade. With 183 member states (‘Parties’), CITES provides a framework for monitoring and controlling trade in wild animals and plants, so as not to threaten their survival.

Over 35,000 species of plants and animals (covering specimens, products, and derivatives) are listed under CITES, including 46 species of sharks and rays (on Appendices I and II). By regulating trade in species that cross international borders (on land and at sea), CITES can be a valuable tool in reducing over-exploitation and driving national management plans.

This system seeks to ensure international trade in listed species is sustainable, legal, and traceable.

Species are proposed for listing by a Party on one of three Appendices.

  • APPENDIX I – International commercial trade is prohibited except in exceptional circumstances. Includes species threatened with extinction.
  • APPENDIX II – Trade is controlled under specific conditions. Species are not necessarily threatened with extinction at this time.
  • APPENDIX III – A certificate of origin is required to trade. Species are protected in at least one country, which has asked other CITES Parties for help in controlling trade.


The Conference of the Parties (CoP) is usually held once every three years, with interim Committee sessions.

Proposals for listing are submitted by Parties in advance and then discussed during the CoP. If a consensus isn’t reached, each proposal is then subject to a vote where it must be supported by a two thirds majority in Committee – it must then be agreed upon in the final Plenary session. If formally adopted, there is a standard 90-day period (although extensions can be requested) before listings are enforced and CITES Parties should implement the new international trade obligations.



  • Sawfishes – (All 5 species: Narrow, Dwarf, Smalltooth, Green, and Largetooth Sawfish) listed on App I by CoP16 (2013) 


  • Basking Shark – listed in 2002 (previously listed on App III in 2000)
  • Whale Shark – listed in 2002
  • White Shark – listed in 2004 (previously listed on App III in 2001)
  • Porbeagle – listed in 2013
  • Oceanic Whitetip Shark – listed in 2013
  • Hammerheads (3 species: Great, Scalloped, and Smooth hammerheads) – listed in 2013
  • Manta Rays (2 species: Giant and Reef Manta) – listed in 2013
  • Devil Rays Mobula spp. (9 species: Sicklefin, Spinetail, Shortfin, Giant, Bentfin, Smoothtail, Atlantic, Lesser Guinean, and Pygmy Devil Rays) – listed in 2016
  • Thresher sharks (All 3 species: Bigeye, Common, and Pelagic threshers) – listed in 2016
  • Silky Shark – listed in 2016
  • Mako sharks (2 species: Shortfin Mako with Longfin Mako included as a look-alike species) – listed in 2019
  • Giant guitarfishes (6 species: Blackchin Guitarfish and the Sharpnose Guitarfish. with 4 additional Giant Guitarfishes included as look-alike species (Giant, Halavai, Clubnose, and Widenose Guitarfish)) – listed in 2019
  • Wedgefishes (10 species: Bottlenose Wedgefish and Whitespotted Wedgefish, with the remaining 8 included as look-alike species (Bowmouth Guitarfish, False Shark Ray, Clown, Smoothnose, Taiwanese, Broadnose, Eyebrow, and African Wedgefish)) – listed in 2019


  • Freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygonidae spp.) – 23 species listed in 2017


CITES is not perfect, it is one measure to protect threatened species. Strict catch fishing limits and measures to reduce bycatch are essential for effective shark conservation.

CITES does not directly affect shark fishing, but it will influence trade and better fisheries management. CITES requires permits to land listed species caught on the high-seas or traded across international borders, to demonstrate source and if they are from a managed fishery that is sustainable.

If properly implemented, this is good news for pelagic species where landings are mostly from high-seas waters (e.g. Shortfin Mako). Otherwise, without high-seas catch limits it would be challenging to prove sustainable fishing. However, for those CITES listed sharks caught within a nation’s waters (Exclusive Economic Zone or EEZ) there are no trade restrictions on domestic landings or internal trade – so we still need effective catch limits to ensure sustainable management of these domestic fisheries.