WHAT IS SQUALENE?

Squalene (or squalane is when it is processed for products) is a natural oil that comes from shark liver. The molecule C30H50 is also found in many plants such as olive oil, and is harvested from plants like sugarcane and soapbox trees and is used for the synthesis of other compounds. A natural lubricating oil, squalene is also an important component of sebum in human skin at around 10%, and is a precursor for other biosynthesis in our livers.

Where is squalene/squalene found?

Commercially derived from shark liver, squalene/squalane is found in cosmetic products including sunscreens, anti-aging creams, lotions, hair conditioners, deodorants, eye shadows, lip balms, lipstick, and face cleansers. It is also used in vaccines and in some have medicinal pills and supplements. Squalene can also be found in some lubricants and cleaning agents. Additionally, squalene occurs in many plants.

Deepwater Sharks Are Threatened by Demand for Liver Oil

One in seven species of deepwater sharks and rays is threatened with extinction because of the liver oil and meat trade and emerging fishing technologies that make it possible to catch deep-sea fishes. This is leading to a developing industry for increased squelne production and threats to deep waters species.

Did COVID Kill More Sharks?

Squalene has been used in vaccines, as an adjuvant that enhances the immune response and makes vaccines more effective. The use of shark-squalene adjuvants to treat influenza has been evaluated by the World Health Organization in vaccines produced by Norvartis, Chiron and other large pharmaceutical companies.

The vaccines currently being administered and developed by Moderna and Pfizer are mRNA vaccines that do not use Squalene. Fortunately for sharks the Johnson and Johnson is a DNA-adenovirus delivered vaccine. However, some companies like GlaxoSmithKline and Seqirus are believed to be using squalene in the development of vaccines not yet brought to market.

An early study by BLOOM discovered that 1 out of 14 products contained shark squalene in the US. The beauty industry claims it’s a perfect mimic of our natural oils for a more youthful face, and some claim it holds medicinal value. What they don’t tell you is that deep sea sharks are a major source of this compound. Some shark populations like the spiny dogfish on the west coast have been overfished commercially, with increased pressure in the Atlantic. These and other sharks are consumed for their meat in addition to liver oil. Some have accused fishermen of killing the sharks for the liver (akin to shark finning) “livering” the sharks and throwing them overboard: however there is no available evidence to substantiate this. A major side effect of the squalene industry is sharks once caught as bycatch and returned to the ocean are now being killed to supply squalene.

The negative effects of squalene for sharks:

Historically, shark liver has been used for vitamin A, particularly during world war II when the east coast cod fishery was blockaded and shut down. Chemosynthesis of vitamin A after the war essentially eliminated the fishery, but the demand did create a sudden market for soupfin, blue and even white sharks off the west coast, and may be the source of some claims of shark livering.

Since sharks don’t have swim bladders like bony fish to aid in buoyancy, they have large oily livers that help them control their buoyancy. The shark’s liver can be up to 25% of its body weight, making it the biggest organ in their body. In general, deeper water sharks have a higher content of squalene than other sharks. Livers are harvested from the spiny dogfish, an abundant species of shark commercially harvested for meat. Other species of dogfish and Gulper sharks (Centrophorus sp.) have been overfished in the NE Atlantic for this product. With high fecundity and a managed fishery off North America, these sharks provide a major source of shark squalene, and the use is contributing to the decline of some species.

BLOOM claims cosmetics use accounts for 90% of shark liver oil production worldwide, contributing to approx. 2.7 million deep sea shark deaths per year.

Many deep sea species like gulper, and rough-skinned sharks have very poor data on population as well as catch rates. Additionally, these and other species do not have the high reproductive rates of other sharks and these fisheries require scrutiny and regulation to avoid overfishing. (Musick, and Musick 2011)

At an estimated rate of 73-100,000,000 sharks killed per year, we need to work on all fronts to protect sharks.

Consumers can act to save sharks

While riding on the hysteria driven by the pandemic, the squalene story makes good press, but can backfire and harm science based conservation decision making. The shark conservation movement should not pit human survival vs sharks, or groups against each other. Shark conservation instead should be based on a rational approach to regulate fisheries, stop shark fin consumptions and reduce bycatch.

TAKE ACTION

In the USA we can continue to pressure lawmakers to support the US Shark Fin Sales Elimination Act, recently scuttled by Florida Senator Mark Rubio, which will be reintroduced in the next seating of Congress. We will also be reintroducing fishing gear regulations vetoed by President Trump, responsible for killing thousands of California sharks.

Currently we do not have a lot of choice of getting a vaccine or what the ingredients are. Consumers can choose products from companies that are squalene free, including supporting Biotech companies like Amyris that do not use squalene. Many manufactures, including LUSH Cosmetics are animal product free, guaranteeing they are shark safe. Consumers should avoid products from companies like M.A.C that uses sharks. In the next administration we will work to urge the FDA to support research in plant based alternatives to squalene and help save sharks.

Many manufactures, including LUSH Cosmetics are animal product free, guaranteeing they are shark safe. Be sure to check your labels for products that are cruelty free/vegan. Once COVID is under control, we can pressure the FDA and manufactures to certify and produce vaccines that do not require shark-based squalene.

Researched and written by Sara Forsgren and David McGuire

SOURCES

M. Azalia Lozano-Grande, Shela Gorinstein, Eduardo Espitia-Rangel, Gloria Dávila-Ortiz, and Alma Leticia Martínez-Ayala, “Plant Sources, Extraction Methods, and Uses of Squalene,” International Journal of Agronomy, vol. 2018, Article ID 1829160, 13 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1829160.

American Cancer Society. “Shark Liver Oil.” Novemer 1, 2008. https://www.cancer.org/healthy/eat-healthy-get-active/acs-guidelines-nutrition-physical-activity-cancer-prevention/common-questions.html

Chaves, Tricia. “What is Squalane?” ThoughtCo, Aug. 22, 2019, thoughtco.com/what-is-squalane-2478094.

Science Daily: “New method could stop shark oil being used in cosmetics and vaccines” https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100518230649.htm

Axiology: “The Truth Behind One of the Cosmetic Industry’s Deadliest Ingredients: Squalene” https://axiologybeauty.com/blogs/our-blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-one-of-the-cosmetic-industrys-deadliest-ingredients-squalene

Bloom: “The hideous price of beauty” http://www.bloomassociation.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/squalane-bloom-english-1.pdf

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “Shark utilization, marketing, and trade.” (1999). http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4795e.pdf

Musick, J.A.; Musick, S.
Sharks. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Reviews and Studies. Rome, FAO. 2011. 13p. http://www.fao.org/tempref/FI/DOCUMENT/reviews&studies/sharks.pdf

WHO Squalene-based Adjuvants in Vaccines Dec. 2008 .